Am 28.04.2013 12:22, schrieb Alexander Graf: > > On 28.04.2013, at 12:16, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> P.S. I am happy about your review comments, but you were not >> intentionally CC'ed on a PReP patch - this is apparently the result of >> Paolo having used hw/ppc/ pattern in the ppc TCG guest core section, >> which used to be target-ppc/ only. Should we exclude prep.c and future >> PReP files or even hw/ppc/ from that MAINTAINERS section? Similar > > I think having hw/ppc at least listed as CC to qemu-...@nongnu.org is a good > idea. I'm not sure how much hassle it'll be to split maintainership inside of > a directory. Does it mean we have to list all files individually? That'd be > annoying :).
Well, what I was rather thinking of was removing F: hw/foo/ from all "Guest CPU cores (TCG)" sections. We already have boards listed individually under "PowerPC Machines", so this seems duplicate here; alternatively it would certainly be possible to add a new heading for hw/foo/ entries. I do not remember seeing any discussion about this MAINTAINERS change nor us ack'ing it, so reverting would seem the most natural solution. Exclusion in the current scheme would mean adding: X: hw/ppc/prep.c Andreas