On (Thu) Oct 22 2009 [09:01:48], Anthony Liguori wrote: > Amit Shah wrote: >> On (Mon) Oct 19 2009 [09:18:19], Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See >>>>> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Copyright IBM, Corp. 2009 >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Authors: >>>>> + * Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> >>>>> + * >>>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.1 or >>>>> later. >>>>> + * See the COPYING.LIB file in the top-level directory. >>>>> + * >>>>> + */ >>>>> >>>> I see you're double licensing it to respect my initial choice, but you >>>> can leave only LGPL for this new code. >>>> >>>> I will send patches changing the ones written by me. >>>> >>> Great, I'm hoping we can make the whole thing LGPL 2.1+ so that we >>> can allow libraries like libvirt to use it. >>> >> >> Why 'or later'? Let's just stick to a version that we know and accept. >> If you end up later liking version 3, you can change the text then. >> > > It really doesn't matter in the context of LGPL so I don't mind if we do > 2.1 only.
Yeah; better a known evil than an unknown one :-) Amit