On (Thu) Oct 22 2009 [09:01:48], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Mon) Oct 19 2009 [09:18:19], Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See
>>>>> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Copyright IBM, Corp. 2009
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Authors:
>>>>> + * Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com>
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.1 or
>>>>> later.
>>>>> + * See the COPYING.LIB file in the top-level directory.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + */
>>>>>
>>>> I see you're double licensing it to respect my initial choice, but you
>>>> can leave only LGPL for this new code.
>>>>
>>>> I will send patches changing the ones written by me.
>>>>
>>> Great, I'm hoping we can make the whole thing LGPL 2.1+ so that we
>>> can allow libraries like libvirt to use it.
>>>
>>
>> Why 'or later'? Let's just stick to a version that we know and accept.
>> If you end up later liking version 3, you can change the text then.
>>
>
> It really doesn't matter in the context of LGPL so I don't mind if we do
> 2.1 only.
Yeah; better a known evil than an unknown one :-)
Amit
