On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 06/05/2013 22:31, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> Jordan Justen <jljus...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> I believe I have processed all of the outstanding pull requests and
>>>> patches tagged for 1.5.  If there are any other patches or pull requests
>>>> you would like to be considered, please respond to this note with a
>>>> pointer to the patch or make sure you send it out tagged with 'for-1.5'
>>>> no later than 5pm US/Eastern.
>>>
>>> Is there a chance of including the KVM PC flash series in 1.5?
>>> Unfortunately, I'm assuming no given the timing.
>>
>> I think we're going to need to delay it.  Did we ever come to a
>> consensus about what to do on older kernels?
>
> Yes, the patches only use the new feature is -pflash is given on the
> command line.  memory_region_set_readonly is only used in a few places,
> so I think this series could go in; it is a fix for a TCG-mode regression.
>
> I'm curious however if it causes -M isapc to regress, because in 1.4 it
> works only in KVM mode, not in TCG mode.

It looks like isapc has always set rom_only to 1, meaning it never
should have supported PC flash. So, I hope isapc didn't ever have any
noticeable behavior change due to the PC flash feature.

-Jordan

Reply via email to