Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:40:54 -0500
Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Yeah, I agree.
When testing migration, for example, I have to type 'migrate -d tcp:0:4444'
several times... Maybe there's a smarter way to do this, but the monitor
macros idea seems interesting to me.
When we have QMP, we can create a QMP socket at a well known location
based on the -name parameter. We could also introduce a qm command that
allowed one to execute monitor commands from the shell. That allows
people to write whatever crazy shell scripts they want.
Yes.
What about the macros idea? Are you against it?
I'm concerned that it's a snowball of complexity waiting to happen for
very little benefit.
I think we're trying to solve a non-existent problem.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
