On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Torbjorn Granlund <t...@gmplib.org> wrote: > Artyom Tarasenko <atar4q...@gmail.com> writes: > > Do I read it correct that qemu-system-ppc64 with the slowdown factor > of 33 is ~3 times faster than qemu-system-sparc64 with the slowdown > factor of 96 ? > > You read it correctly. > > But please see the caveat at the table end. > > Do they both use Debian Wheezy guest? You have a remark that ppc64 has > problems with its clock. Was it taken into account when the slowdown > factors were calculated? > > The time of a job is computed as the difference between a time stamp > made by the test system and the report time. The first time is affected > by ppc64's slow clock, the latter is correct. > > A cron job sets the clock every 30 minutes, so the ppc time might be > *overestimated* < 30 minutes.
Meaning it's even faster than estimated? That's fast. I don't see in the table, how long does the build take? -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko linux/sparc and solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu
