On (Tue) Oct 27 2009 [09:04:50], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Tue) Oct 27 2009 [09:40:27], Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>
>>>> All that said, I'm ok with reverting that patch now till I find some
>>>> kind of a solution to this.
>>>>
>>> Which patch do you want to revert? You're aware that the qcow2 patch is
>>> a data corruption fix?
>>>
>>
>> Ah, no. Reverting my patch that causes this problem. I know the qcow2
>> patch only exposes the bh handling issue. I intend to fix that
>> appropriately elsewhere :-)
>>
>
> How does Kevin's latest patches that introduces new BHs semantics affect
> all of this?
I explained that a couple of mails ago in this thread in a reply to Jan.
Basically, the order in which the BHs run causes the problem, so it's a
race, and Kevin's patch make the BHs run later.
Amit
