在 2013-05-28二的 00:42 +0400，Michael Tokarev写道： > 27.05.2013 05:40, li guang wrote: > [] > >>> NACK. If you want to apply 1-3, okay. But please unqueue 4/4, it makes > >>> no sense as-is (just look at the stderr output to see what I mean) and > >>> it pretends that I suggested that! > >> > >> Actually I did just that, rebuild with DEBUG_DEBUGCON and looked > >> at the output, -- because I didn't know how it works. And you're > >> right, it's not a good change ;) But your email come before I was > >> able to reply. Unqueued. > > > > Hi, Michael > > Hello. Please excuse me for the long(ish) delay, I was out of the city > when you sent this email and when you pinged me on IRC.
That's OK. > > > do you queued patch 1-3? > > if so, I will only send one patch for comments from Andreas, > > otherwise, I will refactor all patches. > > Yes I queued your patches 1-3 but not 4. It can be seen at > http://git.corpit.ru/?p=qemu.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/trivial-patches-next > > (I just rebased it again on top of current qemu/master, but your 3 > patches are there). > > Should I replace these 3 with the next set? I think you don't have to do that. I will try to do a patch base on the patches you queued as Andreas commented. > > But as Gerd correctly say, maybe it's better to just get rid of > these stuff completely, or maybe, just maybe, replace it with > tracepoints. > > Anyway, I think the 3 queued-up patches are okay. > I will consider this comments later. Thanks!
