On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:42:50 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > The 1000ms I talked about is *not* what the guest will see. If there are > > events pending, the throttle API just queues the event and returns right > > away. I'd even _guess_ that this is faster then emitting the event. > > If the filter is not updated for 1000ms then that is guest visible: > it is not getting packets with the new MAC. Let me understand this better: the filter is going to be updated by libvirt, is that correctly? If this is right, then I can understand where you came from, but how can we possibly control how long it will take for libvirt to take action?
