On 06/27/2013 03:24 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 26 June 2013 02:35,  <mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -2630,3 +2630,12 @@ bool cpu_physical_memory_is_io(hwaddr phys_addr)
               memory_region_is_romd(mr));
  }
  #endif
+
+void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque)
+{
+    RAMBlock *block;
+
+    QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) {
+        func(block->host, block->offset, block->length, opaque);
+    }
+}
diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
index e061e21..92a4223 100644
--- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h
+++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
@@ -113,6 +113,11 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(hwaddr addr,
  extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_rom;
  extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_notdirty;

+typedef void (RAMBlockIterFunc)(void *host_addr,
+    ram_addr_t offset, ram_addr_t length, void *opaque);
+
+void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque);
+
  #endif
The prototype is inside an ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY -- the
implementation needs to be as well.

thanks
-- PMM


Good catch. I'll send it in the next patch series ASAP.

- Michael


Reply via email to