On 2013-07-02 13:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 02/07/2013 13:15, Andreas Färber ha scritto: >>>> @@ -683,16 +683,15 @@ GSList *object_class_get_list(const char >>>> *implements_type, >>>> >>>> void object_ref(Object *obj) >>>> { >>>> - obj->ref++; >>>> + __sync_fetch_and_add(&obj->ref, 1); >> How widespread are these in GCC/clang? Is there any fallback? I remember >> seeing some __sync_* warnings on Mac OS X around 4.2... > > We are using them already in several places (vhost was the first one to > introduce them, I think, but now they are also in migration ad in some > tests too). There is no fallback (asm could be a fallback, but we chose > to require GCC 4.2 or newer). > > I'll change this to atomic_inc/dec when applying. Otherwise
But then atomic_dec_and_test or so. Letting the inc/dec return some value leaves room for interpretations (value of before or after the modification?). Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux