Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes:

> On 04.07.2013, at 15:09, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Make it QEMU_OPT_NUMBER, so it gets parsed by generic code, which
>> actually bothers to check for errors, rather than its user, which
>> doesn't.
>> 
>> Cc: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> device_tree.c | 7 ++-----
>> vl.c          | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/device_tree.c b/device_tree.c
>> index 0e7fe2d..10cf3d0 100644
>> --- a/device_tree.c
>> +++ b/device_tree.c
>> @@ -240,11 +240,8 @@ uint32_t qemu_devtree_alloc_phandle(void *fdt)
   uint32_t qemu_devtree_alloc_phandle(void *fdt)
   {
       static int phandle = 0x0;

       /*
>>      * which phandle id to start allocting phandles.
>>      */
>>     if (!phandle) {
>> -        const char *phandle_start = qemu_opt_get(qemu_get_machine_opts(),
>> -                                                 "phandle_start");
>> -        if (phandle_start) {
>> -            phandle = strtoul(phandle_start, NULL, 0);
>> -        }
>> +        phandle = qemu_opt_get_number(qemu_get_machine_opts(),
>> +                                      "phandle_start", 0);
>
> Zero is a valid phandle to start from. It shouldn't mean "default".

We get here only when phandle is zero (which it initially is).

If opts don't contain a value for "phandle_start", we set phandle to
zero, i.e. do nothing.  Exactly the same as before.

If that's wrong, it should be fixed in a separate patch.

Reply via email to