On 06.07.2013, at 12:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 July 2013 01:36, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote:
>> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
>> index 8b06a19..fbc3cac 100644
>> --- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
>> +++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
>> @@ -2434,8 +2434,11 @@ typedef union target_epoll_data {
>>
>> struct target_epoll_event {
>> uint32_t events;
>> +#ifdef TARGET_ARM
>> + uint32_t __pad;
>> +#endif
>> target_epoll_data_t data;
>> -};
>> +} QEMU_PACKED;
>> #endif
>> struct target_rlimit64 {
>> uint64_t rlim_cur;
>
> Is ARM really the only arch that needs the pad field?
It's the only one I definitely know about. Other targets may add it as they see
fit. It shouldn't be more broken than before really, where we just took random
host alignment.
Alex
