Richard,
--On 23 July 2013 13:09:18 -0800 Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote:
On 07/20/2013 10:06 AM, Alex Bligh wrote:
+int64_t qemu_clock_deadline_ns(QEMUClock *clock);
+int64_t qemu_clock_deadline_all_ns(void);
+int qemu_timeout_ns_to_ms(int64_t ns);
+gint qemu_g_poll_ns(GPollFD *fds, guint nfds, int64_t timeout);
Why continue with the g_ prefix here? Surely qemu_poll_ns is sufficient.
Only because it was a g_ type function (takes GPollFD*, guint, and returns
gint). Quite happy to make it a qemu_poll_ns. Perhaps I should make it take
uint and return int at the same time.
TBH I am confused as to why we use g_poll at all. I thought originally
we were using it for win32, but that doesn't use g_poll. Given poll is
POSIX, what platforms do we target which are glib, !win32, and !posix?
Using straight posix would be easier.
--
Alex Bligh
