Il 25/07/2013 12:23, Benjamin Herrenschmidt ha scritto: > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 10:38 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 25 July 2013 10:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> >> wrote: >>> That's fine, I know you can fix stuff :-) I'm just really annoyed that >>> upstream qemu remained broken for so long (and still is) while the whole >>> thing derailed into a mostly pointless discussion on endianness and >>> nobody (including Alexey) hollered loud enough that the breakage was >>> fairly extensive >> >> I think that for the minor architectures we just have to make >> sure that we do yell loudly when things are broken, because >> the nature of things is that people won't notice. Maybe we should >> have a qemu-urgent list to parallel qemu-trivial for compile >> fixes, reversions of bad breakage, etc, to try to keep them >> out of the general noise ? > > Or I teach Alexey to yell louder (along with some French :-) > > Not sure if a mailing list is useful. A tag might be enough > [REGRESSION] ? [URGENT] ? Those kind of subject tags tend to stand out > pretty well on mailing lists.
I've definitely seen them already in the past on qemu-devel, so I concur that a mailing list is not useful. Paolo
