On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:05:12PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > I can change the implementation but I don't think it's > > a good idea to copy property names around: > > it's too fragile, compiler won't warn us if we > > change the name or value semantics, > > I'm not worried. Changing the strings will break the command line > interface too (qemu -device pvpanic,ioport=...), so that isn't going to > happen. > > cheers, > Gerd
What will catch this breakage? There are 0 users actually tweaking the port number so I'm sure no one will notice this. In any case, catching errors at compile time is much better than at runtime. What exactly are advantages of duplicating property names in this way? I don't see any. -- MST
