On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:24 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > Ben has pointed out that POWER5++ PVR-wise was a POWER5+ v3.0+ or so > and, according to you, POWER5++ is not just a revision with > hardware-only changes and a new marketing name. So no, it's not always > just the upper 16 bits.
Also 4xx uses a different bit split etc... that's why qemu should do like the kernel and use a mask/value pair to do the matching. Cheers, Ben.
