Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > On 11/19/2009 11:25 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> But I can't see that need in your particular example. The client asks >> the server to create a snapshot. The operation fails. The client >> already knows what the name of the snapshot is, doesn't it? No need to >> get it from the error. > > Yeah, I just took a random error from grep so your objection makes > total sense. But is that still true when we have asynchronous > notifications?
I don't know. We'll figure it out when we get them. Asynchronous notifications aren't errors, are they? I'd expect them to be different kinds of objects. And then what makes sense for one of them may or may not transfer to the other.
