Am 08.08.2013 17:23, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 3 August 2013 09:31, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de> wrote: >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> >> >> This reverts commit 9b8c69243585a32d14b9bb9fcd52c37b0b5a1b71. >> >> The commit was wrong: We only return -1 on invalid accesses, not on >> valid but unbacked ones. This broke various corner cases. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> > > This revert fixes the regression in the 'musicpal' board. > > Presumably these two patches should go into 1.6 since it is > a regression fix... cc'ing Anthony.
Since no one has spoken up with a concrete use case that breaks when having the PIO region opaque, I agree this seems the best solution we have for 1.6. But given the musicpal issue you have raised, I would ask Paolo or Jan to squash these two patches together to avoid a git-bisect regression. Thanks, Andreas > > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > -- PMM > -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
