On 15 August 2013 23:18, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: > But doesn't that mean that there is _currently_ no problem ? If so, > we can introduce the additional code when the problem really shows up. > Being Preemptive is good, but if it is not really needed today > I would rather have today's problems resolved and bother about tomorrow's > when they show up.
Conceptually the two parts go together: rely on correct irq routing, tell qemu we rely on correct irq routing. It's only one extra line... -- PMM
