"Anthony Liguori" <aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote on 24/11/2009 16:27:58: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Oh, indeed, thanks. Due to the fact that this discussion suggested that > > there are still open issues, I did not even checked git. > > They still need to be addressed. However, I wanted to do that work in > the tree vs. outside of the tree. With all the qmp stuff happening, > that seemed like the rationale thing to do. >
What do you think about the following syntax: migrate [-d] URI [block:default_copy_level:[<device:copy_level>,.....,<device:copy_level>] copy_level: 0 - flat copy. 1 - copy only first COW level. .. n - copy all COW levels. default_copy_level: use this copy level for all devices that are not mentioned in the migrate command. I intend to implement it this week, I am planning to implement on the first phase only copy levels 0 and 1. It suppose to solve the major problem today that a guest has one block device that needs to be copied flat and the other block device that needs to be COW copy. - Liran