Il 26/08/2013 21:47, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > In general I'm not convinced it's wise to give end-users and distros > even more config options to shoot themselves in the foot with
Note that the Kconfig project is about giving end users _less_ config options. default-configs/ does not capture dependencies (except in a very elementary way through pci.mak and usb.mak), while Kconfig does. Kconfig basically makes configuration of builtin devices automatic just by choosing the desired boards. > (and every distro is going to end up wanting to build an "everything" > config anyway, and hopefully most people use distro builds, so > what's the use case for anything else?) Not every distro, as mentioned in my answer to rth. Paolo
