On 24.11.2009, at 20:48, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Alexander Graf wrote: >>> Oh, that's bad :-) >>> >>> That should really be it's own character device. We don't really have a >>> way to connect two character devices like that. Maybe muxing? >>> >> >> So you want me to implement char muxing and a bootloader within a week? :) >> > > Char muxing is already there.
Ah :-). I guess I could also just create a separate console. It's only for early printk anyways. > Don't know what to do about the bootloader bit. At this point, I'm curious > about whether kboot would be a viable solution. My opinion would be to leave it as is for now and switch to a real bootloader that runs inside the guest later. Alex
