On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:41:47PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:53:00PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > However, I'm not really sure how the above overlaps with your SVVP > > patch.. > > > It is not. I am just thinking about putting real info there instead of > "not supported". SVVP pass as it is. Do you prefer to leave it as is?
Okay. I defer to your and Sebastian's best judgment. -Kevin
