On 16.08.2013, at 00:35, Andreas Färber wrote: > Instead of relying on cpu_model, obtain the device tree node label > per CPU. Use DeviceClass::fw_name when available. This implicitly > resolves HOST@0 node labels for those CPUs through inheritance. > > Whenever DeviceClass::fw_name is not available, derive it from the CPU's > type name and fill it in for that class with a "PowerPC," prefix for > PAPR compliance.
Could we just mandate the fw_name field to always be set for all classes instead? Alex
