On 15 September 2013 18:23, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> +/* Add a property that is an integer constant. */
> +#define OBJECT_ADD_PROP_CONST(obj, name, value) \
> + do { \
> + void OBJECT_ADD_PROP_GET(Object *OBJECT_ADD_PROP_OBJ, \
> + struct Visitor *OBJECT_ADD_PROP_VISITOR, \
> + void *OBJECT_ADD_PROP_OPAQUE, \
> + const char *OBJECT_ADD_PROP_NAME, \
> + struct Error **OBJECT_ADD_PROP_VALUE_ERR) \
> + { \
> + int64_t OBJECT_ADD_PROP_VALUE = value; \
> + \
> + visit_type_int64(OBJECT_ADD_PROP_VISITOR, \
> + &OBJECT_ADD_PROP_VALUE, \
> + OBJECT_ADD_PROP_NAME, \
> + OBJECT_ADD_PROP_VALUE_ERR); \
> + } \
> + object_property_add(obj, name, "int", OBJECT_ADD_PROP_GET, \
> + NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL); \
> + } while (0)
This won't compile in clang, because it doesn't support nested
functions. Clang is our primary compiler for MacOS hosts and
is useful for various testing scenarios too (like its "integer sanitizing"
compile options) so I'd rather we didn't break it...
thanks
-- PMM
