On 17.09.2013 16:27, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/17/2013 01:01 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> I don't have anything against it in principle, but just adding c0 and c1, >> which iirc should cover all uses, would be fine by me. > > Not really. > > There are 6 potential args[] values, 5 of which might be const_args[]. > > > r~
Ok adding all of those would be a waste, did not keep the movcond changes into consideration. Your initial proposal was indeed the best tradeoff then, lets just hoist the most commonly used args then. C.
