On 18.09.2013 16:54, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/18/2013 01:24 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> If you _really_ want to strip the right shift functionality away for some >> reason, could you state it? > > (1) It will never never ever be used. > > (2) I do not find + for LSR, - for LSL intuitive at all. > If we're to have them at all, better to pass that > separately from the shift count, an enumeration that > exactly maps to the "shift" field in the insn. > > (3) It will never never ever be used.
You seem to feel strongly about it, and I don't, so lets indeed drop it then. C.
