On 8 October 2013 05:17, Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> If we're updating, why would we update only to r0p1 and not to the most >> recent rev/patchlevel? > > Does ARM provide physical vexpress platform with newer revisions of > A9? If yes, then I > agree we should update to the most recent revision delivered by ARM on > physical vexpress. > If I understand correctly, physical vexpress with A9 r0p0 does not > exist and hence we > have this problem.
vexpress is not the only Cortex-A9 board we support -- we can't base our decisions about how to model the CPU purely on what is best for that board. -- PMM
