On 16 October 2013 16:22, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: > Given how little is typically in the -user .mak fragments I wonder what > the point of them is. Should the build fall-back to a generic .mak > fragment if there is no special config for a given build target?
At the moment our list of "targets that you can build" is exactly "list of targets with a .mak file", so in order to have a generic .mak you'd need to have a list of supported targets somewhere else. Personally I'm not sure that's worth doing (possibly the "move to Kconfig" work will obsolete these files anyway.) -- PMM
