On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:56:57PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 02.12.2009 20:12, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > >> I thought attaching a second copy were the way to send the patch > >> properly. > >> > > > > Attaching as an application/octet-stream is not terribly helpful. It > > basically means you've attached a binary blob. > > > >> Is the proper way described somewhere? > >> > > > > The proper way is to use a mailer that isn't broken. Attaching > > everything as "application/octet-stream" is broken. > > Some mailers do the right thing if the attachment name ends in .txt > (maybe that helps with gmail).
linux documentation suggests firefox extension ViewSourceWith.
