On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:23:45 -0200 Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:32:03 -0600 > Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > > > > Both freshly rebased against staging (which doesn't build btw). > > > > > > > Nope, and it won't for a while. Instead of fixing everything, I'm just > > focusing on small groups of patches at a time. > > Right, but people rebasing against it need to build it to be able > to fix conflicts and test things. > > So, here is a list of problems I had to fix/workaround to have staging > fully building on x86_64. With recent changes the -net one went away and we got a new one: - virtio-rng: /home/lcapitulino/src/aliguori-queue/hw/virtio-rng.c: In function ‘virtio_rng_save’: /home/lcapitulino/src/aliguori-queue/hw/virtio-rng.c:147: error: implicit declaration of function ‘virtio_save’ /home/lcapitulino/src/aliguori-queue/hw/virtio-rng.c: In function ‘virtio_rng_load’: /home/lcapitulino/src/aliguori-queue/hw/virtio-rng.c:157: error: implicit declaration of function ‘virtio_load’ Added Ian to the CC list.. Hm, this is stupid report being useful to anyone? :)
