Il 26/10/2013 10:45, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: >> Sure, x-rdma => rdma *is* stable. I'm not sure about x-rdma-pin-all though. > > Use of this capability (which is disabled by default) is actually > "safer" than migration without it - you would get an early warning well > in advance of actually starting the iterative phases that there was not > sufficient memory available on the destination.
I guess that shows more of my (lack of) knowledge about RDMA. :) You're obviously right, x-rdma-pin-all could make sense even if we had fancy caching strategies. Paolo
