petar.jovano...@rt-rk.com writes: > From: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovano...@imgtec.com> > > Creating target_structs header in linux-user/$arch/ and making > target_ipc_perm and target_shmid_ds its first inhabitants. > The struct defintions may/should be further fine-tuned by arch maintainers. > > Signed-off-by: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovano...@imgtec.com> > --- > v3: > - add GNU licence to the new header files. > > v2: > - target_struct headers have been created and the patch has been split into > two separate patches. > > linux-user/aarch64/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/alpha/target_structs.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/arm/target_structs.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/cris/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/i386/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/m68k/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/microblaze/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/mips/target_structs.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/mips64/target_cpu.h | 18 ++++++++ > linux-user/mips64/target_structs.h | 2 + > linux-user/openrisc/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/ppc/target_structs.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/qemu.h | 1 + > linux-user/s390x/target_structs.h | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/sh4/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/sparc/target_structs.h | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/sparc64/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/syscall.c | 76 > ++++++++++++-------------------- > linux-user/unicore32/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/x86_64/target_structs.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 20 files changed, 963 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) <snip>
There is an awful lot of similarity between a lot of the structures while not being totally identical. Given the syscall munging is common is there not an argument for having a common header for this case? -- Alex Bennée
