On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:34:25AM -0500, "Michael R. Hines" <mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 07:00 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > >Since more integer parameters would come in the future, so how about > >set_migrate_parameter similar to set_migrate_capability? > >It sets integer value, while set_migrate_capability sets bool value. > > That's a very good idea, I think - but we might get some pushback > from the list. Maybe. Actually we already have three configurable parameters. bandwith_limit, xbzrle_cache_size, max_downtime. They can be all consolidated. > There is a hesitation to add such low-level parameters, but for > something like > micro-checkpointing that may potentially have large impacts on > application performance, > I do think it would be critical to expose more customizability > like 'set_migrate_parameter' to management software. > > In fact, this separation of function may be "better" than continuing > to expand > the list of individual commands in the QEMU monitor. > > Could you submit a patch for the framework of such a command? Sure. -- Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamah...@gmail.com>
