Am 05.12.2009 18:27, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > If qemu_malloc() didn't carry the name "malloc()" then semantics with > size=0 would be a different discussion. But so far, all qemu_* > functions tend to behave almost exactly like their C counterparts. > Relying on the result of size=0 with malloc() is broken.
Then let's rename it as qemu_getmem, do a sed run over the whole code and have sane semantics. :-) Kevin
