Am 12.11.2013 04:02, schrieb Chen Fan: > On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 09:54 +0800, 赵小强 wrote: >> He asked me to drop the parent_realize. so in v2, I just replace the >> 'init' with 'realize'. >> > Hmm，I'm confused, Go through the entire QEMU source code, there was no > DeviceRealize realize field in leaf child, I think Andreas's purpose for > you was not simple to replace the 'init' by 'realize'. Maybe I'm > mistaken, I hope Andreas could give some comments about this.
I was serious about that. It appears that my earlier reply didn't arrive on the list, so I resent it today, hope that sheds some light. My virtio series had been reworked in the same fashion but is *still* in need of sending to the list... > on the other hand, I feel good regarding refactor QOM'ify apic, I'm now > making adding 'cpu-del' supported patches. which need unrealize the apic > device. so please rebase your work on Andreas's git source: > git://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu.git qom-cpu. > then we can do for them together. Actually the only pending work is Igor's x86 properties on qom-cpu-next as of now. Both qom-cpu and qom-next have recently been merged so should be no different from upstream qemu.git. The QOM device refactorings are usually taking place on qom-next branch at the same repository. We'll have to see how that works out with the CPU work - ideally I'd merge qom-next first, then continue on qom-cpu. Regards, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
