On 11/15/2013 09:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 15/11/2013 06:14, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >> >> It does not feel that we really need CPUState::kvm_cpu_id and >> direct calling of kvm_arch_vcpu_id() would be enough. > > Indeed -- and it should be kvm_ppc_vcpu_id() since other architectures > do not need it.
And ignore kvm_arch_vcpu_id() for spapr/ppc? -- Alexey
