On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:32:27PM +0800, Li Guang wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 04:18:45PM +0800, Li Guang wrote: > >>Hu Tao wrote: > >>>On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:14:18AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>>On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:38:37AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > >>>>>it fixes IRQ storm since guest isn't able to lower SCI IRQ > >>>>>after it has been handled when it clears GPE event. > >>>>> > >>>>>Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov<imamm...@redhat.com> > >>>>The storm is only on memory hotplug right? > >>>IIRC, it happens on cpu hotplug, too. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>:-), that made remember EC implementation, > >>with EC, SCI will be safer, I think. > >Hmm you are saying let's use EC for memory hotplug? > > > > > It can be a bridge between guest and QEMU, > with it, we may don't have to bother ASL writing > and south-bridge hardware related work(or very > little) if we implement EC correctly. > >
I'd like to see that. Can you write a document (just text) for an imaginary EC support for memory hotplug?
