Am 22.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 22/11/2013 12:13, Peter Lieven ha scritto: >>> I see where you come from, but I think the potential for this patch to >>> break some working configuration (for some definition of working) is too >>> high. Can you split out the fixes to the "fill in the blanks" logic? >> >> I can, but the number of sockets is logal to the parse function. > > Not sure why that matters, just make two patches instead of one.
...and please CC me and possibly Eduardo who refactored it last IIRC. Andreas >> What would you think is it okay to just send a warning about >> the illegal config and drop the exit(1). > > Yes, that would be okay. > > Paolo -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg