Am 22.11.2013 12:20, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 22/11/2013 12:13, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>> I see where you come from, but I think the potential for this patch to
>>> break some working configuration (for some definition of working) is too
>>> high.  Can you split out the fixes to the "fill in the blanks" logic?
>>
>> I can, but the number of sockets is logal to the parse function.
> 
> Not sure why that matters, just make two patches instead of one.

...and please CC me and possibly Eduardo who refactored it last IIRC.

Andreas

>> What would you think is it okay to just send a warning about
>> the illegal config and drop the exit(1).
> 
> Yes, that would be okay.
> 
> Paolo

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

Reply via email to