On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:29:44AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 22.11.2013 um 17:58 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 01:24:47PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > > Interesting implementation, it looks pretty good. I'll need to review > > it a second time to track all the operation block/unblocks. It wasn't > > immediately clear to me whether these patches will restrict something > > that used to work. > > We still have a lot of time for 1.8, so I think we can be radical here: > If something doesn't have a test case and we don't catch it during the > normal review, then let's just break it. Someone will find it and then > we'll get a test case for it, so that it doesn't happen again.
Don't hold it up on my account, but let's still review properly. Stefan
