On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 03/12/2013 10:44, Markus Armbruster ha scritto: >> >> There are some _nofail functions left, but none of them can use >> error_abort. >> >> If anything assigns to error_abort, we're probably screwed. No bright >> idea how to prevent that at compile-time. > > Isn't it always used by address? >
Yes, but my implementation has reliance on it being null. That can be fixed with a bit a statement re-ordering. Regards, Peter > Paolo >
