Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> writes:

> Am 28.11.2013 17:26, schrieb arm...@redhat.com:
>> Markus Armbruster (10):
>>   qdev: Replace no_user by cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   sysbus: Set cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   cpu: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   apic: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   pci-host: Consistently set cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   ich9: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   piix3 piix4: Clean up use of cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   vt82c686: Clean up use of cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   isa: Clean up use of cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet
>>   qdev: Do not let the user try to device_add when it cannot work
>
> I've applied all except for the ISA patch, which doesn't feature a
> Reviewed-by yet.
>
> https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-next
>
> I'd appreciate if some previous reviewer can comment on whether any
> issues have been resolved satisfactorily.

Paolo answered a question I posted along with my RFC series, Peter
pointed out two wires I missed in v1 (fixed in v2), Marcel examined v3,
but didn't feel familiar enough with the code to risk a formal
Reviewed-by.  I asked Anthony to review a couple of times, and he said
he intended to.

However, consider the timeline:

Oct 10 RFC
* you, Paolo, Kevin and Anthony commented

Oct 17 v1

Oct 29 v2: address Peter Maydell's review
* Some commit messages improved
* Use QOM cast macros instead of .parent_class [PATCH 05]
* keep cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet for port92, isa-pit,
  kvm-pit, m48t59_isa, mc146818rtc [PATCH 09]

Oct 30 v3: address Eric Blake's and Marcel Apfelbaum's review
* Clean up a harmless editing accident in PATCH 07
* Simplify PATCH 10 slightly

Nov 28 v4: straightforward rebase (only PATCH 10/10 conflicts)

It's been more than six weeks since the last review comment.  I doubt
more waiting (and more rebasing) will be productive.

Reply via email to