On 17.12.2013, at 14:22, Jens Freimann <jf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth <th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > I missed to set the CC in the CHSC instruction when I refactored > the CC setting in the IO instructions with the following commit: > 5d9bf1c07c1369ab3506fc82cc65a10f4415d867 > s390/ioinst: Moved the CC setting to the IO instruction handlers > This patch now restores the correct behaviour of CHSC by setting the > condition code 0 at the end of the instruction. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <jf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> I suppose this patch should be CC'ed to stable? Alex > --- > target-s390x/ioinst.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/target-s390x/ioinst.c b/target-s390x/ioinst.c > index 8d6363d..b8a6486 100644 > --- a/target-s390x/ioinst.c > +++ b/target-s390x/ioinst.c > @@ -622,6 +622,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb) > break; > } > > + setcc(cpu, 0); /* Command execution complete */ > out: > s390_cpu_physical_memory_unmap(env, req, map_size, 1); > } > -- > 1.8.3.4 >
