On 18 December 2013 14:21, Tom Musta <tommu...@gmail.com> wrote > So it would seem to make the most sense to go back and do what I had done > originally -- separate the softfloat fixes into their own patch set and > make the VSX and P7 patches dependent on those. Agree?
Yeah, that works. But really what I need is to not have "patch 1 adds function X; patch 2 fixes a bug that was introduced in patch 1". I don't so much care whether the softfloat patches are a freestanding set or a part of a PPC series, as long as the patches themselves are in a reviewable state. thanks -- PMM
