Il 08/01/2014 17:51, Igor Mammedov ha scritto: >> > >> > Thanks Igor! I like very much patches 1-4 (though I'm thinking that we >> > need some style conventions for interfaces). I think patch 5 adds more >> > complexity than we need, but I'm open to discussion. > I'm sorry that it took so long. > The reason for separate interfaces is that realize interface is more generic > and might be used outside of '-object'. While I don't see 'path' interface > ever used outside of -object.
Yeah, I think the two interfaces are a good idea. The question is whether we want the second interface at all. I think it's fine to delegate namespace conventions to management. Regarding the "overloading" of the realize name, I was against it in previous discussion and I still am (I was in favor of something like UserCreatable and naming the method "complete" or "construct"), but I didn't want to sound too negative. :) Paolo