On 8 January 2014 18:39, M P <buser...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will re-add the trace for both write and read and see if I can narrow the > range down; it will be linux specific, tho, that's why I thought a > 'catchall' block was more appropriate.
Well, we should be implementing what the hardware does, generally. Misimplementing things as "read as written" isn't really any better than misimplementing them as RAZ/WI, it's just differently wrong. thanks -- PMM
