Hello Paolo, Thanks for your quick reply.
On Jan14 18:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I think this was nacked already in the past. You would need to > implement some kind of ACL system like the one that is in place for > bridges. Without it, for example, you could hijack existing iptables rules. I don't get it; this does not change anything to the existing but permits to change the default "tap" string prefix. Am I missing something? -- William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
