On 9 February 2014 02:59, Peter Crosthwaite
<peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote:

> Agreed. With diff-correction based on this scheme:
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com>
>
>  But the nice thing about having named fields is it
>> doesn't actually matter what order things go in.
>>
>
> But for similar entries its much more readable if they are self-consistent.

Yes; this patch in particular was rather inconsistent and I
have fixed it.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to