Il 17/02/2014 14:15, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
Does this mean that error_is_set() is always used by programmer to check a non-NULL error pointer? Is there any case to call error_is_set(errp) without knowing if errp is NULL or not? If no, should we enforce the rule and add assert(errp) in error_is_set()?
I think we shouldn't need error_is_set() at all... Paolo