On 12/19/2009 03:32 PM, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
     switch(args[4]) {
     case TCG_COND_EQ:
-        tcg_out_brcond(s, TCG_COND_NE, args[0], args[2], const_args[2], 
label_next);
-        tcg_out_brcond(s, TCG_COND_EQ, args[1], args[3], const_args[3], 
args[5]);
+        tcg_out_brcond(s, TCG_COND_NE, args[0], args[2], const_args[2],
+                       label_next, small);

Shouldn't it be 1 instead of small?

Sigh, yes indeed.


r~


Reply via email to